Underwood v. Bank of Huntsville
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Dissent
Rules of law should comport as much as possible with business customs and practices and with the intention of the parties. The majority's rejection of the Totten trust results in a blind rule that would give no weight to these considerations.
The Court of Appeals of New York resolved conflicting treatments of bank deposits in prior New York cases when it decided In re Totten, 179 N.Y. 112, 71 N.E. 748 (1904). It quoted extensively from the cases to explain the development of the rule that the creation of a bank account in the name of the depositor "as trustee for" (or, as here, "as custodian…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of TottenNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
- McLain v. McLainMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
- Concannon v. WinshipNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Loco Credit Union v. ReedNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1973
- Rasmussen v. Oshkosh Savings & Loan Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.