Legal Opinion

Ridge v. Bright

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1956No. 738PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

It is not contended that the instrument under consideration was executed in the manner required by law so as to be valid as a testamentary disposition of the shares of stock involved. Consequently, the question to be determined is whether the instrument created a valid inter vivios trust which entitled Virginia Eitch Bright to the stock upon the death of the settlor-trustee, Lottie Rascoe McMillan Ivey. However, in making this determination we must consider (1) whether upon the execution of the so-called trust instrument, the defendant, Virginia Fitch Bright, acquired an interest in the…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Becker v. St. Louis Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. National Shawmut Bank v. JoyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
  3. Kelley v. SnowMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  4. Cleveland Trust Co. v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Farkas v. WilliamsIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Westerfeld v. HuckabyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Bland v. Branch Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. Baxter v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  4. Smith v. FrancisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
  5. Moore v. JonesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API