Legal Opinion

Connecticut National Bank v. MacHnik, No. 534362 (Feb. 9, 1994)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided February 9, 1994No. 534362UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.] MEMORANDUM OF DECISION

ISSUE Whether the plaintiff's motion to strike defendants, four special defenses, claim of set-off, and counterclaims should be granted.

Because the plaintiff's motion fails to set forth each claim of insufficiency and to specify the reason or reasons for each such claimed insufficiency, the plaintiff's motion to strike the defendants' four special defenses, claim of setoff, and counterclaims is denied. CT Page 1468

FACTS

By a third amended complaint filed August 31, 1993, the plaintiff, Shawmut…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Morris v. Hartford Courant Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  2. Blancato v. Feldspar Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Rowe v. GodouSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Bouchard v. People's BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Meredith v. Police Commission of the Town of New CanaanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. Jacobson, Brown, Tillinghast, No. Cv940064249 (Feb. 8, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
  2. Rebound Physical Therapy Sports v. Jackman, No. 0132940 (Dec. 12, 1996)Connecticut Superior Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API