Legal Opinion
Borrell v. Naval Facilities Engineering Command
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 11, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-1160Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ERIC JAMES BORRELL, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 1:19-cv-01160 (CJN) NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND WASHINGTON, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Eric James Borrell, proceeding pro se, alleges that he was improperly terminated from his civil service position with the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (“NAVFAC”), a division of the Department of the Navy, because the action lacked due process, defamed him, violated the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, and improperly deprived him of his security clearance. See…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Jerome Stevens Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Food & Drug AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Department of the Navy v. EganSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.