Legal Opinion
Roe v. City of New York
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided November 21, 2002No. 00 Civ. 9062(RWS)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Plaintiffs James Roe (“Roe”), Hilton Perez (“Perez”), John B., and the putative class of registered participants in ■ authorized needle exchange programs, collectively the “Plaintiffs,” have moved for partial summary judgment on Count XII .of their Second Amended Class Action Complaint (“SACAC”) seeking declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. Defendants, the City of New York (the “City”), the New York City Police Department Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly (“Commissioner Kelly”), New York Police De-. partment Detectives Lance Ho (“Detective Ho”) and Paul A.…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Baggett v. BullittSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- New Paltz Central School District v. St. Pierre Ex Rel. M.S.District Court, N.D. New York · 2003
- In Re Fairfield Sentry Ltd.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- The New York Times Co. v. GonzalesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2005
- McCulley v. N.Y.S. Department of Environmental ConservationDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2006
- Xynergy Healthcare Capital II LLC v. Municipio de San JuanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.