Legal Opinion
Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided January 16, 2002No. File No. X07CV990072908SPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
INTRODUCTION
SFERRAZZA, J.
The defendant, Doncasters, Inc., moves for summary judgment in the present action filed by Cheryl Stebbins, the named plaintiff, together with well over twenty other plaintiffs, who are present or former employees of the defendant. The motion claims that the present action is barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act, chapter 508 of the General Statutes, and the expiration of any applicable statute of limitations. The plaintiffs contend that their claims fall within the exception to the exclusivity statute enunciated in Suarez v. Dickmont…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Jett v. DunlapSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Driscoll v. General Nutrition Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sorban v. Sterling Engineering Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Lucenti v. LavieroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Zurbriggen v. Twin Hill Acquisition Co.District Court, E.D. Illinois · 2018
- Stebbins v. Doncasters, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Martinez v. Southington Metal Fabricating Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.