Legal Opinion
Motzer v. Haberli
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 26, 2011No. SC 18649PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Randall Motzer, appeals1 from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of *735the defendants, Edward Haberli and E. Haberli Electric, LLC, following the trial court’s decision to grant the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict. In granting the motion, the trial court concluded, inter alia, that the plaintiffs claims were barred by the exclusivity provision of the Workers’ Compensation Act (act), General Statutes § 31-275 et seq., and that the plaintiff had failed to establish that his employer committed an intentional tort that caused the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. ColonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. Fernando V.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Curran v. KrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Lucenti v. LavieroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Martinez v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Briere v. Greater Hartford Orthopedic Group, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.