Legal Opinion

In re Laque

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided June 25, 2004No. 2003-B-3539PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*754■ ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS.

I,PER CURIAM.

This disciplinary matter arises from three separate sets of formal charges filed by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (“ODC”) against respondent, Louis Jef-fries Laque, III, an attorney licensed to practice law in Louisiana, but currently ineligible to practice.1

UNDERLYING FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

00-DB-005

Count I — The Thomas Matter

In January 1998, Nolan and Juanita Thomas retained respondent to represent them in a dispute with a Metairie car dealership. On January 28, 1998, Mr. and Mrs. Thomas paid respondent $255 in connection with the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. WhittingtonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. ReisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1987
  3. In Re CaulfieldSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
  4. In Re PardueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  5. In Re QuaidSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  2. In re PhelpsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. In re WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API