Legal Opinion
Jose Ramon-Sepulveda v. Immigration and Naturalization Service
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 20, 1988No. 86-7536PublishedCited by 83 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
Jose Ramon-Sepulveda seeks attorneys’ fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A) (Supp. III 1985). We grant his motion for fees; however, except for an inflationary adjustment, we decline to award fees in excess of the $75 statutory maximum.
I
The facts of this case are set forth in detail in our two previous opinions, Ramon-Sepulveda v. INS, 743 F.2d 1307 (9th Cir.1984) (Ramon-Sepulveda I), and Ramon-Sepulveda v. INS, 824 F.2d 749 (9th Cir.1987) (Ramon-Sepulveda II). The following facts are relevant here. In 1978, the INS unsuccessfully tried…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. LarionoffSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Stanley Spencer v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by83 opinions
- Johnson v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- Saluja Thangaraja v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Nadarajah v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Richard S. RUSSELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.