Commercial Casualty Ins. v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
The suit is upon a policy commonly known as “burglary insurance”. Plaintiff insists in his complaint and proof that his iron safe situated in the office of his bakery business in Anniston, Alabama, was on the morning of April 17, 1938, burglarized, resulting in the loss of money and securities. There was verdict and judgment for $880 from which the defendant company prosecutes this appeal.
The policy provided in the insuring and covering clause as follows: “Indemnity for loss — 1. To indemnify the Assured for loss by burglary, which shall mean the felonious abstraction…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Santa Cruz Fruit Packing Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pow v. Southern Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.