Mulder v. Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Asch, J.
The facts set forth herein are taken from the plaintiffs complaint. Since we are dealing with an appeal from an order granting, in part, and denying, in part, a motion to dismiss that complaint for failure to state a cause of action, we must assume for the purposes of this appeal that all of these facts are true, and resolve all inferences reasonably flowing from them in favor of the plaintiff (Sanders v Winship, 57 NY2d 391, 394).
Plaintiff auditor has been a member of the Securities Industry Association for over 20 years and an employee of the defendant brokerage…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Rovello v. Orofino Realty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Rocanova v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Weiner v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1982
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Virgilio v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Greenbaum v. Svenska Handelsbanken, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Missigman v. USI Northeast, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Mulder v. DonaldsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Brady v. Calyon Securities (USA)District Court, S.D. New York · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.