Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Belinfante

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 2, 1975No. 50666PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff brought an action charging defendant with battery and the negligent extraction of sixteen teeth without plaintiffs permission. At the conclusion of a jury trial, the defendant moved for a directed verdict and the trial judge granted the motion. Appellant alleges error in the court’s directing a verdict for the defendant.

The evidence shows that on January 6, 1971, appellant went to the offices of Dr. Belinfante, an oral surgeon. Upon arrival, appellant filled out and signed an information chart containing the following language: "I agree for Dr. Lewis S.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mims v. BolandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1964
  2. Woods v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Pendergrast v. GreesonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gathers v. Harris Teeter Supermarket, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984
  2. Joiner v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1990
  3. Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1984
  4. Gowen v. CadyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  5. Winfrey v. Citizens & Southern National BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API