Legal Opinion
Doe v. United States
District Court, D. South Carolina
Decided September 24, 1984No. Civ. A. 84-1132-15PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAMILTON, District Judge.
This matter is before the court upon the defendant United States of America’s (hereinafter “U.S.A.”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure due to this court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The defendant contends that the plaintiff’s action is barred by the assault and battery and/or discretionary function exceptions to the Federal Tort Claims Act (hereinafter “FTCA”). 28 U.S.C. § 2680(a) and (h).
Mary Doe filed this action pursuant to the FTCA, 28 U.S.C. § 2671, et seq., to seek redress for various harms arising…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sandra B. Andrews and Kenneth M. Andrews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1981
- Lola Rabon v. Guardsmark, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1978
- Lane v. Modern Music, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
- Herring v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1952
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Birkner v. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1989
- Theresa H. Wood v. United States of America, Charles D. Owens, Theresa H. Wood v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
- JH BY DH v. West Valley CityUtah Supreme Court · 1992
- Dodge v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001
- Doe v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.