Legal Opinion

Crews v. Pfizer Drug Chantix

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided February 13, 2024No. 2:21-cv-01487Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION DANNY CREWS, } } Plaintiff, } v. } Case No.: 2:21-cv-01487-MHH } PFIZER, INC., } } Defendant. } MEMORANDUM OPINION In this action, pro se plaintiff Danny Crews alleges that because he used the prescription smoking cessation aid Chantix, manufactured by defendant Pfizer Inc., he developed cancer and other medical issues. (Doc. 7, p. 1). Pfizer has filed a motion for summary judgment. In its motion, Pfizer argues that Mr. Crews’s claim fails as a matter of law because Mr. Crews has not disclosed an expert…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Reginald Jones v. UPS Group FreightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  3. Hendrix Ex Rel. Gp v. Evenflo Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
  4. Marianne Chapman v. The Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Edeline Julmisse Prosper v. Anthony MartinCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API