Goldsmith v. City of Indianapolis
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFansler, J.
This is an appeal from an interlocutory order temporarily restraining the defendants from constructing a business building within 500 feet of property under the jurisdiction of the board of park commissioners of the city of Indianapolis. The procedure under which interlocutory orders are made does not contemplate motions for a new trial, and the statute providing for appeals from such orders contemplates only an exception to the order. The only error assigned which we need consider is that the court erred in granting the temporary injunction.
Appellant Goldsmith was the owner of certain lots…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fischer v. St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Inhabitants of Quincy v. KennardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- General Outdoor Advertising Co. v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1930
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. BlindIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by11 opinions
- E. B. Elliott Adv. Co., Henry F. Hill, Intervenor-Appellant v. Metropolitan Dade County, a Political Subdivision of the State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Indiana Toll Road Commission v. JankovichIndiana Supreme Court · 1963
- Indianapolis Water Co. v. LuxIndiana Supreme Court · 1946
- State Ex Rel. Barner v. White Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
- Koss v. Continental Oil Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1944
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.