Legal Opinion

Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 2005No. B177852; No. B180696PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

INTRODUCTION

This proceeding arises out of a grand jury investigation into allegations that two Roman Catholic priests, petitioners Doe 1 and Doe 2 (sometimes hereafter referred to as the Priests), sexually assaulted children while they worked for petitioner Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a Corporation Sole (hereafter referred to as the Archdiocese). In seeking to quash grand jury subpoenas duces tecum, petitioners raise issues that require a balance of the rights of religious belief and practice with the rules of the criminal justice system.

As the California…

2Cases cited60 opinions

  1. Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
  3. Behunin v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  4. Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. Doe 2 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API