Roman Catholic Archbishop v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KLEIN, P. J.
INTRODUCTION
This proceeding arises out of a grand jury investigation into allegations that two Roman Catholic priests, petitioners Doe 1 and Doe 2 (sometimes hereafter referred to as the Priests), sexually assaulted children while they worked for petitioner Roman Catholic Archbishop of Los Angeles, a Corporation Sole (hereafter referred to as the Archdiocese). In seeking to quash grand jury subpoenas duces tecum, petitioners raise issues that require a balance of the rights of religious belief and practice with the rules of the criminal justice system.
As the California…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Lemon v. KurtzmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Duronslet v. KampsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Padron v. Watchtower Bible & Tract Soc'y of N.Y., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Behunin v. Superior Court of Los Angeles CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Doe 2 v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.