Hastalis v. Firemen's Insurance Co. of Newark
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Woods, Judge:
This is a statutory action in assumpsit to recover for the total loss of certain property during the policy term. The primary issue raised by the pleading is: Was the policy in force at the time of the fire? The jury answered in the affirmative. Plaintiff prosecutes error to the action of the trial court in setting aside the verdict.
The plaintiff, on January 12, 1932, took out a policy in defendant company in amount of $2,000.00, and a policy for $1,000.00 on adjoining property in another company, through Stuart-Lowe Company, a local insurance agency. The premium for both…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Colonial Assurance Co. v. National Fire InsuranceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
3Cited by7 opinions
- Medford v. Pacific National Fire InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Summers v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Ingalls v. Commercial Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- Financial Indemnity Co. v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Williams v. Republic InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.