Legal Opinion

Ingalls v. Commercial Insurance Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 1962PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.

The principal issue on this appeal is whether an insurance agent, by his statements in disregard of a cancellation notice sent out to an insured directly by the insurance company, can revoke the cancellation and reinstate the insurance thereby making the insurer liable on the insurance policy. We find, as did counsel, that this is a question of first impression in Wisconsin.

All of the authorities cited by the appellant that do express the general rule that an agent, under the circumstances of each case, can bind an insurance company by an oral agreement with the insured, are distinguishable…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schomer v. Hekla Fire InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Hartford Fire Insurance v. ReynoldsMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Kiviniemi v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Jeske v. General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Albert v. Home Fire & Marine Insurance Co. of CaliforniaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nugent v. SlaghtCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  2. Kamikawa v. KeskinenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Scheuer v. Central States Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1975
  4. Financial Indemnity Co. v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. NorgaardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API