Cadichon v. Facelle
New York Court of Appeals
1Dissent
Graffeo, J. (dissenting).
Although it may not be apparent from the majority writing, the issue before us is whether the courts below abused their discretion in declining to reinstate plaintiffs’ claim after it was dismissed as a consequence of their undisputed failure to comply with a CPLR 3216 90-day demand to file a note of issue. Because I discern no abuse of discretion, I would affirm.
The majority reinstates plaintiffs’ complaint based on their conclusion that the purported “ministerial” dismissal of the claim was erroneous because it was not preceded by a motion on notice—an argument that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Kihl v. PfefferNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Baczkowski v. D.A. Collins Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1997
- Gibbs v. St. Barnabas HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 2010
- Miceli v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.