Legal Opinion
State v. Thrower
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 29, 1991No. 14899PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Reece, Judge.
The question presented in this appeal is whether the spouse of an individual convicted under the Ohio racketeer influenced and corrupt organizations statute, R.C. 2923.32 et seq. (“RICO”), can assert dower rights against real property forfeited to the state.
Facts
The parties have stipulated to the facts of this case. Albert D. Thrower and his brother, Thomas D. Thrower, pled guilty in 1989 to violations of Ohio RICO as well as trafficking in marijuana, R.C. 2925.03(A), and permitting drug abuse, R.C. 2925.13(B). An appeal was taken to this court and the case was remanded for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kneisley v. Lattimer-Stevens Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- In Re Assets of Tom J. Billman, United States of America v. Barbara A. McKinney Robert Budjac Roselyn BudjacCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
- State v. ThrowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- United States v. Dennis P. Marx A/K/A Dennis Martin, Big "D," Dennis Burtell, Appeal of Mary Ann MarxCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- United States v. SchifferliCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stanley P. Aronson v. City of AkronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- State v. KeithOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
- Drown v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In Re Barnhart)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011
- Albert Thrower v. Terry SteelCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Gorsha v. ClarkDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019