Legal Opinion
State v. Keith
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 6, 1991No. 91CA005046PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Quillin, Presiding Judge.
In this appeal we must decide whether a purported custodial bank account was properly forfeited to the state under the Ohio RICO statute. We affirm.
On June 12, 1990, defendant-appellant, Song Keith, was indicted on two counts of promoting prostitution and one count of engaging in a pattern of corrupt activity. Pursuant to R.C. 2923.31 et seq., the state imposed a corrupt activities lien on all real estate and bank accounts held by Keith.
On November 7, 1990, Keith pleaded guilty to all three counts. As a condition of her plea, Keith agreed to forfeit all of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gordon v. GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In Re Marriage of JacobsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Golden v. GoldenDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
- Heath v. HeathAppellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- State v. ThrowerOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sternlicht v. SternlichtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
- Marshall v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1993
- State v. TolbertOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Rice v. Logan Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1996
- Sternlicht v. SternlichtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.