Youngblood v. State
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SHEPARD, Chief Justice.
The question presented is whether a guilty plea record in which the trial court did not advise the defendant of his Boykin rights may be rehabilitated through testimony during a post-conviction hearing. We hold that it may.
In 1978, Youngblood pled guilty to aggravated assault and battery in return for a suspended sentence. He later filed a petition for post-conviction relief asserting, among other things, that his plea was not entered voluntarily and intelligently. The trial court denied Youngblood's petition and the Court of Appeals affirmed. Youngblood v. State, 528…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Carnley v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. TimmreckSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- White v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1986
- Claude Francis Roddy, Jr. v. Harold E. Black, SuperintendentCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Berdin v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1994
- Horton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
- Victor Ponce v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. EilandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
- David Earl Ison v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.