Legal Opinion

United States v. Nash

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided November 7, 1901PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Criminal Prosecution. On motion to quash indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

The first count in the indictment in this case charges, in brief, that the defendants, being the owners of a certain vessel of more than 15 tons burden, bearing the name of “R. Nash,” and propelled by means of fluid and gasoline power, engaged the said vessel in freight and passenger carriage for hire to and from Louisville, Ky., and to and from other points on the Ohio river, and that while so engaged the hull, tank, and appliances for storing, generating, and applying such fluid and gasoline as its motive power were not under license or certificate of inspection as…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Huntington v. AttrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1892

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. BarbourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  2. United States v. Alexander StavrosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. Gelinas v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
  4. Poindexter v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. O'DELL v. City of KnoxvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API