Legal Opinion

Haskell v. Ross

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 1918No. 9759PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Muskogee County ; R. P. De Graff enriad, Judge. Action by P. D. Ross against Nannie L. Golding and M. G. Haskell. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant Haskell brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTisinger, J.

This case comejs from the district court of Muskogee county, where P. D. Ross recovered a money judgment against Nannie L. Golding and M. G. Haskell, at the November, 1917, term. M. G. Haskell, one) of tbe defendants in that court, brings the case here by petition in error and case-made.

The defendant in error has filed his (motion to dismiss the appeal on two grounds: (1) That Nannie L. Golding, a joint judgment debtor with M. G. Haskell, was not made a party to the proceeding to reverse such judgment and was not served with the case-made or summons in error. (2) That the judgment, appealed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  3. Elliott v. OrtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  4. City of Lawton v. AyresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Basic Refractories, Inc. v. BrightNevada Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Ingram v. GrovesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Mosier v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Smith v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API