Legal Opinion

Smith v. Smith

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 7, 1925No. 14470PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

A motion to dismiss this proceeding in error was filed by the 'plaintiff September 17, 1923', and on October 9, 1923, an order was made pro forma denying said motion. At the time this order was entered the ease had not been briefed upon the merits nor ordered submitted. Upon filing of! the briefs in the case the cause was thereafter submitted and assigned upon th^ merits.

At 'the threshold of this case the motion of plaintiff to dismiss the appeal is presented and urged in ‘his brief. The ground upon which, a dismissal is urged is that defendant has recognized the validity…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  2. Bennett v. . Van SyckelNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  3. Barnes v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1899
  4. Elliott v. OrtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. City of Lawton v. AyresSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brandt v. LaneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  2. Mosier v. MosierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  3. Wallace v. Boston Mutual Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
  4. Davis v. FlintSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  5. Revard v. RevardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API