Legal Opinion

Berkman v. Weckerling

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 11, 1956No. 36,569, 36,570, 36,571PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank T. Gallagher, Justice.

Appeal from a judgment of the district court in favor of O. F. Weckerling, defendant, and against Robert Berkman, plaintiff. This is an action to vacate three judgments quieting title in defendant to certain properties located at Chisholm, Minnesota. It is alleged by plaintiff that these prior actions were entered without jurisdiction and were obtained by fraud in that plaintiff and his father, C. E. Berkman, were not named as parties in those actions.

The facts necessary to a determination of this case are as follows: The properties involved in these actions prior…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Geisberg v. O'LaughlinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  3. Weckerling v. McNiven Land Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  4. Town of Hinckley v. Kettle River RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  5. Bloomquist v. ThomasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goldsworthy v. State, Department of Public SafetySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
  2. Konantz v. SteinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. Johnston v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. Stonewall Insurance Co. v. HorakSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  5. Turner v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API