Legal Opinion

Turner v. Commissioner of Revenue

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 11, 2013No. A13-0927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LILLEHAUG, Justice.

Taxpayers Brian and Dawn Turner appeal the Minnesota Tax Court’s dismissal of their appeal from an order of the Com*207missioner of Revenue (Commissioner). The tax court concluded that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction because the Turners’ appeal was untimely, as it was filed well after the 60-day deadline in Minn.Stat. § 271.06, subd. 2 (2012). The Turners argue that the statutory filing period did not begin to run when the order was issued because they did not consent to receive the order electronically and the Commissioner did not properly mail the order.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Sartori v. Harnischfeger Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Michael and Jean Antonello v. Commissioner of Revenue, Relator.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  2. Daniel L. Berglund, Relator v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
  3. Christopher J. Wendell and Nancy A. Wendell, Relators v. Commissioner of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API