Legal Opinion

Durkin v. Intevac, Inc.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 30, 2001No. SC 16386PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ZARELLA, J.

This is a products liability action arising out of a military helicopter collision that occurred in Australia on June 12, 1996. The primary issue in this interlocutory appeal1 is whether the trial court abused *457its discretion in denying the defendants’ motions to dismiss on the ground of forum non conveniens. We conclude that the doctrine of forum non conveniens requires that the action be dismissed. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the trial court to the contrary.

On June 12, 1996, in Northern Queensland, Australia, two Australian military Black Hawk helicopters…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Van Cauwenberghe v. BiardSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Pain v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. Allstate Life Insurance Co. v. Linter Group LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aranda v. Philip Morris U.S. Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2018
  2. Kedy v. A.W. Chesterton Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
  3. Can v. Goodrich Pump & Engine Control System, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2010
  4. DeCicco v. Dynata, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024
  5. Fudge v. Alliant Foodservice, No. Cv 01 0812056 S (Jul. 12, 2002)Connecticut Superior Court · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API