Legal Opinion

McCormick v. Sheridan

California Supreme Court

Decided December 11, 1888No. 11,339PublishedCited by 11 opinions

On proceedings against Frederick H. Waterman for contempt.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

On October 23, 1888, the judgment of the court below was affirmed herein, upon an opinion written by *36Commissioner Belcher, concurred in by Commissioners Foote and Hayne, and adopted by this court: McCormick v. Sheridan, 77 Cal. 253, 19 Pac. 419. On November 23d a petition for a rehearing, signed, “Shafter, Parker & Waterman, Attorneys” for appellant, was filed herein. Upon reading the said petition we were surprised to find statements therein which were intended apparently to reflect on the good faith and diligence of the commissioner who had written the opinion. Among other things, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WoolleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1875
  2. McCormick v. SheridanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Lamberson v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1907
  2. State Ex Rel. Giblin v. SullivanSupreme Court of Florida · 1946
  3. State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  4. Lapique v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Application of StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API