Legal Opinion

Application of Stone

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1957No. 2772PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Defendant stands charged with contempt in an action invoking the original jurisdiction of this court. The evidence discloses a long continuing, carefully planned attack on members of the supreme court, and we must now determine whether or not such acts constitute a direct contempt and whether they are a clear and present danger to the court and to the administration of justice in Wyoming. The charges in the petition relate only to acts and statements against this court. However, Art. 5, § 2, Constitution of Wyoming, provides that:

“The supreme court shall have * * * a general…

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Schenck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Whitney v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Gitlow v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Bridges v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by10 opinions

  1. Alva Owen Hawkins v. Honorable Joseph R. Moss, Chief JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. Horn v. District Court, Ninth Judicial DistrictWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Connors v. ConnorsWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Bi-Rite Package, Inc. v. District Court of the Ninth Judicial District of Fremont CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Anderson v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API