Legal Opinion

Bostock-Ferari Amusement Co. v. Brocksmith

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 14, 1905No. 5,167PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Erom Sullivan Circuit Court; Orion J3. Harris, Judge. Action by Otto Brocksmith against the Bostock-Ferari Amusement Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtComstock, C. J.

The complaint alleges that the plaintiff, while driving in his buggy, was injured in consequence of his horse taking fright from the sight of a bear walking along a public street of the city of Vincennes. The action was begun in the circuit court of Knox county, and, upon change of venue, tried in the circuit court of Sullivan county. The court rendered judgment upon the verdict of the jury in favor of appellee for $750. The complaint was in three paragraphs. The first was dismissed, and the cause was tried upon the amended second and third paragraphs, to which a general denial was filed.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Macomber v. NicholsMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. FarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Holland v. BartchIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Gilbert v. Flint & Pere Marquette Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Scribner v. KelleyNew York Supreme Court · 1862

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cook v. Whitsell-ShermanIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Candler v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Irvine v. Rare Feline Breeding Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Thompson v. LeeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Hardin v. ChristyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API