Holland v. Bartch
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.
This is an action for damages. The first para*47graph of the complaint alleges that “ the plaintiff, on the 16th day of August, 1885, was seated in a twó-seated carriage, to which two gentle and well broken horses, both properly harnessed with good and sufficient harness, were properly and securely attached and hitched in the usual way, which said horses were then and there carefully and properly driven by a careful and competent driver seated in said carriage, and was then and there driving said team and carriage in which plaintiff was seated as aforesaid, on the public road and highway leading…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cleveland, Columbus, Cincinnati & Indianapolis Railway Co. v. WynantIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton R. R. v. ChesterIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Mercer v. CorbinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. FarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hawley v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Luther v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1912
- Molway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Knouff v. City of LogansportIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- North Chicago Street Railroad v. CossarIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
- Rayner v. RamirezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.