Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 22, 2011PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Supreme Court denied the defendant’s motion for resentencing solely upon the ground that his status as a reincarcerated parole violator made him ineligible for relief under the 2009 Drug Law Reform Act, which is codified by CPL 440.46. However, “prisoners who have been paroled, and then reincarcerated for violating their parole, are not for that reason barred from seeking relief under the statute” (People v Paulin, 17 NY3d 238, 242 [2011]; see People v Vidal, 87 AD3d 1085 [2011]; People v Santiago, 87 AD3d 1077 [2011]; People v Howard, 85 AD3d 1202, 1202-1203 [2011]; People v Phillips, 82…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PaulinNew York Court of Appeals · 2011
  2. People v. PhillipsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  3. People v. HowardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  5. People v. VidalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  2. People v. LankfordNew York Supreme Court · 2012
  3. People v. AshbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API