Legal Opinion

Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Remmy

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1859PublishedCited by 21 opinions

APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.

Remmy and Spaugh sued the Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Company, for a failure to deliver, in time and condition, freight, consisting of certain car loads of hogs. The complaint states that the company “ agreed to and with the plaintiffs that, in consideration of the payment of a large sum of money, to-wit,” &c., “the said company would carry said hogs with all proper care and speed,” &c., “to,” &c.; “and that in pursuance of said contract,” &c., the hogs were delivered and received, &c.

The agreement is not alleged to be in writing.

For breach, it is averred that, through carelessness…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Washington v. SoriaMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
  4. Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API