Indianapolis & Cincinnati Railroad v. Remmy
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Decatur Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Remmy and Spaugh sued the Indianapolis and Cincinnati Railroad Company, for a failure to deliver, in time and condition, freight, consisting of certain car loads of hogs. The complaint states that the company “ agreed to and with the plaintiffs that, in consideration of the payment of a large sum of money, to-wit,” &c., “the said company would carry said hogs with all proper care and speed,” &c., “to,” &c.; “and that in pursuance of said contract,” &c., the hogs were delivered and received, &c.
The agreement is not alleged to be in writing.
For breach, it is averred that, through carelessness…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by21 opinions
- Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. SelbyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. WalserIndiana Supreme Court · 1864
- Washington v. SoriaMississippi Supreme Court · 1896
- Terre Haute & Logansport Railroad v. SherwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Bartlett v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1884
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.