Legal Opinion

Lung v. Washington Water Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 22, 1927No. 20249. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

In this action, the respondent Lung recovered, on a trial by jury, against the appellant Washington Water Power Company, for personal injuries.

The appellant owns and operates a street car system which extends over certain of the public streets of the city of Spokane. Among such streets is a street known as Division street, which extends north and south over the Spokane river, which is crossed hy a bridge. Leading to the bridge, on its north side, is an elevated approach, called in the record a viaduct. Over the bridge and the viaduct, the street car tracks are doubled. Over the easterly of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mosso v. E. H. Stanton Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Dyerson v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  3. Bruggeman v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  4. Locke v. Puget Sound International Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Thompson v. CollinsWashington Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Herndon v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Smith v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Brum v. HammermeisterWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fisher v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Dye v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API