Legal Opinion

Howard v. Lunaburg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1927PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVinje, C. J.

The objection to the survival of the action was that since the sole defendant was dead it appeared from the face of the complaint that it stated no cause of action against the executrix. The objection was equivalent to a general demurrer, and the order overruling it was therefpre appealable.

That a cause of action existed against the original defendant is conceded. Sec. 246.07, Stats. The sole question is, Does the action survive? At common law tort actions did not survive. This was so although property rights were incidentally affected. 1 Ruling Case Law, 31. Such rule was founded on the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Bennett v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Hurle's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
  4. Cutter v. HamlenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  5. Norton v. SewallMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. MidelfortWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Hanson v. ValdiviaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Fowlie v. First Minneapolis Trust Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. Zartner v. HolzhauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Deeg v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API