Legal Opinion

Froelich v. Werbin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 12, 1973No. 46,757PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order dismissing an action to recover damages for an alleged invasion of plaintiff’s privacy by defendant.

The record on appeal consists only of plaintiff’s abbreviated petition, the defendant’s motion to dismiss and the journal entry of the trial court’s ruling, which does not set forth the legal principles controlling the decision as required by Supreme Court Rule No. 116 (209 Kan. xxxviii) — an omission which complicates our consideration on appellate review.

The nub of plaintiff’s claim is set out in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. ParrillSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Humble Oil & Refining Company v. HarangDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1966
  3. Sade v. HemstromSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
  4. McGregor v. TurnerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  2. Stueve v. American Honda Motors Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1978
  3. Froelich v. WerbinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  4. Commerce Bank, N.A. v. Liebau-Woodall & Associates, L.P.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2001
  5. Froelich v. AdairSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API