Preskar v. United States
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
EDMUND F. BRENNAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This action, in which plaintiffs are proceeding in propria persona, was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 72-302(c) (21), pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). All named defendants have filed motions to dismiss, which, together with plaintiffs’ oppositions, were deemed submitted without oral argument. See L.R. 78-230(h). Having considered all submitted materials, the court recommends that defendants’ motions to dismiss be granted without further leave to amend.
I. BACKGROUND
This case is proceeding on the amended…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schultz v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Schultz v. United States Department of StateDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2022
- Sherman v. KruseDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024
- Smith v. WatanabeDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2023