Legal Opinion
Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. v. Orloff
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided March 21, 2005No. 257, 2004PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
This is an appeal from a final judgment entered by the Court of Chancery. The plaintiff-appellee, George D. Orloff, filed a complaint pursuant to section 220 of Title 8 of the Delaware Code (“section 220”) seeking inspection of the books and records of Weinstein Enterprises, Inc. (“Weinstein”) and the production of certain documents in the possession of J.W. Mays, Inc., a publicly held New York corporation (“Mays”) of which Weinstein is a 45.16% stockholder.
The Court of Chancery found that Mays is a “subsidiary” of Weinstein for purposes of section 220(a)(3). Weinstein was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Rales v. Blasband Ex Rel. Easco Hand Tools, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Beam Ex Rel. M. Stewart Living v. StewartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- In Re Teleglobe Communications Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Data Key Partners v. Permira Advisors LLCWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Pamela Brennan v. Concord Efs, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Lambrecht v. O'NEALSupreme Court of Delaware · 2010
- Franchise Servs. of N. Am., Inc. v. U.S. Tr. (In Re Franchise Servs. of N. Am., Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.