Legal Opinion

United States v. Cynthia Diane Roberts, Johnny Binder, Jr., and Martha Marie Preston

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided September 19, 1990No. 88-6185PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

Today we decide — among other points of error — whether the government’s use of four peremptory strikes to exclude black veniremembers violated the defendants’ constitutional rights under Batson v. Ken tucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) and whether an ex parte communication between the district court’s case manager and the jury violated the defendants’ fifth and sixth amendment rights. We find no reversible error by the district court and therefore affirm their convictions.

Appellants Cynthia Diane Roberts, Johnny Binder, Jr., and Martha Marie Preston…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. United States v. BroussardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  3. United States v. Hugh Von Meshack Lawayne Thomas Linda Parker Terrence Ian Hodges, Also Known as GudaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
  4. United States v. MaserattiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  5. United States v. Thomas Bentley-Smith and Edsil M. Elledge, Jr., A/K/A Ken ElledgeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API