Legal Opinion
Marshall v. Klatt
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 3, 1937No. Civ. 1624PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.
This is an appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $3,043.28, resulting from an automobile accident which happened in the intersection of Tustin and Santa Clara Avenues in Orange County. Defendant has also attempted to appeal from an order denying his motion for new trial. Such order is not appealable. (Sec. 963, Code Civ. Proc.)
Defendant urges two grounds for a reversal of the judgment: (1) That there is no evidence of any negligence on his part and (2) that the evidence shows plaintiff guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law. As the findings of fact are…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Reaugh v. Cudahy Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
- Rush v. LagomarsinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Gritsch v. Pickwick Stages SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Brower v. ArnsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Hodges v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sills v. ForbesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Grasso v. CunialCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Stafford v. AlexanderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Wilson v. RhoadesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952