Legal Opinion

Sills v. Forbes

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1939No. Civ. No. 2257PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarks, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of Herold Sills, a minor, against Henry Forbes and E. C. Salyer in the sum of $5,000 for personal injuries suffered in an automobile accident, and in favor of Virgle Sills and J. B. Long, cross-defendants, against Henry Forbes and E. C. Sal-yer, cross-complainants. When appropriate, we will refer to Herold Sills as the plaintiff and to Henry Forbes and E. C. Salyer as the defendants.

The accident, a head-on collision between two motor vehicles, happened at slightly before 6 o’clock on the morning of October 13, 1936, on a private road about twenty…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Benson v. Baltimore Traction Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Scalf v. EicherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Buckingham v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1932
  4. Henslee v. FoxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Kirkpatrick v. DamianakesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Perry v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  2. Hession v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. United States v. BarnerDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1961
  4. Behling v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Laidlaw v. PerozziCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API