Legal Opinion
People v. Stoerkel
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 17, 1927No. Docket No. 1544PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.
The defendant was convicted and sentenced for the crime of robbery and appeals from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial. The principal basis of his complaint is that the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict, although he does assign as error the admission of certain testimony and also charges misconduct on the part of the district attorney.
At about 9:45 P. M. on the evening of May 2, 1927, two of the People’s witnesses, Arthur M. Taube and Emma A. Kropp, were held up and robbed of $118 in money and a diamond ring worth approximately $500 as they sat in an…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Pierson v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- People v. FerdinandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- People v. . HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Commonwealth v. CoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- People v. RichardsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- People v. HightowerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- People v. SimeoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- People v. RamseyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- People v. BeltowskiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.