Legal Opinion
Mollo Unemployment Compensation Case
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 16, 1958No. Appeal, No. 151PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Wright, J.,
The claim of Betty H. Mollo for unemployment compensation was denied by the Bureau, the Referee, and the Board of Review upon the ground that her unemployment was due to voluntarily leaving work, wherefore she was ineligible for benefits under Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law. Act of 1936, P. L. [1937] 2897, 402(b), 43 P.S. 802(b). Claimant has appealed.
*88Appellant had a valid separation from her employment with Roth Knitting Mills, 2025 East Boston Avenue, Philadelphia, and was thereafter referred to. Sue Mattioli, 1101 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kendall Refining Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Erie Forge & Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
- Rosell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
3Cited by16 opinions
- Pierce Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Busfield Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Palovich Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
- Goldstein Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
- Junda Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.