Legal Opinion

TRANSIT EQUIPMENT COMPANY v. Dyonisio

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 6, 1964No. 20169PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hall

The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court. Plaintiff in error is a corporation substantially owned and controlled by one Marshall. We refer to it as Transit and to Marshall by name.

The defendant in error Benedicto Dyonisio substantially owns and controls the defendants in error, World Aircraft and Sales Company and Sanford Export Company. We treat them as one and refer to them as Dyonisio.

The defendant in error Companhia Motores Centro Americanos, S. A., is substantially owned and controlled by the defendant in error Alonzo Petteys. We treat them as one and refer to them…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Realty Development Company v. FeitSupreme Court of Colorado · 1963
  3. Dyonisio v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Charles Ilfeld Company v. TaylorSupreme Court of Colorado · 1964
  3. Helfenbein v. BARAE INVESTMENT CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  4. Fulenwider v. WRITER CORPORATIONColorado Court of Appeals · 1975
  5. Madrid v. NortonWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API