Legal Opinion
Walsh v. State
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 5, 1997PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Per curiam
The judgment is reversed, substantially for the reasons expressed in Judge Skillman’s dissenting opinion of the Appellate Division, reported at 290 N.J.Super. 13, 674 A.2d 988 (1996).
For reversal — -Chief Justice PORITZ and Justices HANDLER, POLLOCK, O’HERN, GARIBALDI, STEIN and COLEMAN — 7.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Walsh v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC ADVOCATENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996
3Cited by24 opinions
- State, Office of Employee Rel. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
- Allen v. FauverSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
- Golden v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Coyle v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2002
- DiPaolo v. PASSAIC BD. FREEHOLDERSNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1999
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.