Legal Opinion
Allen v. Fauver
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 10, 2001PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Per curiam
Plaintiffs are State corrections officers who seek incidental overtime wages under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. § 201 to § 219, and New Jersey’s Wage and Hour Law, N.J.S.A. 34:11-56a1 to -56a30. They filed this class action against the State, the Governor, and the Commissioner of Corrections, the latter two in their official capacities only.
The trial court dismissed both counts of plaintiffs’ complaint, and the Appellate Division affirmed that judgment. The Appellate Division held that the Wage and Hour Law did not apply to the State because that statute does not include the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Alden v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Willis v. Department of Conservation & Economic DevelopmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- Rochinsky v. State of NJ, Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Taylor v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Brian Royster v. New Jersey State Police(075926)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Cockrell v. Board of Regents of New Mexico State UniversityNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- Brian Royster v. New Jersey State PoliceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- State of New Jersey, by the Commissioner of Transportation v. Cherry Hill Mitsubishi, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2015
- County of Hudson v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.