Legal Opinion

McKennan v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1914No. 17,698PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

In the former opinion in this case (McKennan v. Omaha & C. B. Street R. Co., 95 Neb. 643), it was held that, there being a conflict in the evidence with relation to the circumstances surrounding the injury and also with reference to the extent of plaintiff’s injuries, these questions were proper to be submitted to the jury. It was also held that the first paragraph of instruction No. 7 was incorrect as applied to the facts in this case. The language of this part of the instruction was not applicable, since the statement “that teamsters have the legal right to cross the street at any point…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. The GermanicSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Chunn v. City & Suburban R. Co. of WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Indianapolis Traction & Terminal Co. v. KiddIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. McIntyre v. OrnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
  2. Lucas v. Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Reed v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Kubicek v. SlezakNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Burton v. Lincoln Traction Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API