Taylor v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. J. W. McKinley, R. C. Gortner, and W. R. Millar, for Appellant. Clayton R. Taylor, and Leonard B. Slosson, for Respondents.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
This court granted the application of the defendant corporation for a hearing after decision in the district court of appeal for the second district, which affirmed the order of the superior court granting the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. The hearing was granted because of the conclusions reached by the district court of appeal in regard to instructions Nos. 7 and 31, which were given to the jury, and which shall be presently considered. The rest of the opinion, which we hereby approve and adopt, is as follows:
“This is an appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- Scott v. San Bernardino Valley Traction Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Holmes v. South Pacific Coast RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Starck v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wells v. LloydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Johnson v. Sacramento Northern RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Berguin v. Pacific Electric RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Buttrick v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1927
- McDonell v. American Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.