Legal Opinion

Moss v. Improved Benevolent & Protective Order of Elks of the World

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 18, 2000No. COA99-804PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAGLES, Chief Judge.

In deciding whether the Alabama default judgment was enforceable in North Carolina under the full faith and credit clause of the federal constitution, see U.S.Const. Art IV, § 1, we first consider whether defendants Wilson and the Elks were properly served under Alabama law. Defendants argue that they were not properly served with a summons and complaint. Plaintiffs argue that service was accomplished by (1) certified mail and (2) personal service on Larry Wallace at the 19 April default hearing. Because we affirm the North Carolina trial court’s ruling that defendants…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Insurance Mgt. & Admin. v. Palomar Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  3. Boyles v. BoylesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Singleton v. AllenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1983
  5. Vaughn v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Barton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  2. DOCRX, Inc. v. EMI Services of NC, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. Parris v. LightCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  4. AMERICAN TIRE DISTRIBUTORS, INC. v. RameyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Barton v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API